It is the duty of a scientist to criticize his own work and that of his colleagues; it is his responsibility to develop critical skill. Strangely there is little published material which can help to develop this skill. There are of course, many books on research design, research methods, statistics and the like and these sometimes make gestures like “features of a good research design” or “common faults”. But this kind of formalism is not enough and bears no resemblance to the procedures and comments of a good critic in action. (p. 186)
Lumsden, J. (1973). On criticism. Australian Psychologist, 8, 186-192.
Voir aussi Alain (1956), Michell (2004), Rozeboom (1984).
OpenEdition vous propose de citer ce billet de la manière suivante :
Stéphane Vautier (7 mars 2016). James Lumsden on criticism. Thérapies contemporaines (ex Épistémologie de la psychologie). Consulté le 12 décembre 2024 à l’adresse https://doi.org/10.58079/ogqn
Bien sûr que critiquer est un devoir universitaire. Il y a au moins un chemin pour apprendre à critiquer : la logique.